Conferences in DBLP

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL) (icail)
2009 (conf/icail/2009)

1. 
   Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
   
   
2. 
   Isomorphism and argumentation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
   
   
3. 
   Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments?: a case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHR. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
   
   
4. 
   A next step towards automated modelling of sources of law. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
   
   
5. 
   NLP-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
   
   
6. 
   NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semantics. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
   
   
7. 
   Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
   
   
8. 
   Formalising dynamic protocols for open agent systems. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
   
   
9. 
   Improving the comprehension of legal documentation: the case of patent claims. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
   
   
10. 
    Segmentation of legal documents. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
11. 
    Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
12. 
    Why lawyers are nice (or nasty): a game-theoretical argumentation exercise. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
13. 
    Case law in extended argumentation frameworks. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
14. 
    Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
15. 
    Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
16. 
    Intelligent hybrid approach to false identity detection. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
17. 
    Integrating induction and deduction for finding evidence of discrimination. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
18. 
    Query-based opinion summarization for legal blog entries. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
19. 
    Incorporating issues of fairness into development of a multi-agent negotiation support system. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
20. 
    Reasoning with spatial plans on the semantic web. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
21. 
    Human-aided computer cognition for e-discovery. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
22. 
    Toward a general theory of document modeling. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
23. 
    A proposal for evidential reasoning about motives. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
24. 
    Plausibility schemas: templates for legal factfinding. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
25. 
    Evidence transmutations: gathering admissible evidence using belief revision. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
26. 
    Abstract specification of legal contracts. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
27. 
    Supporting of legal reasoning for cases which are not strictly regulated by law. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
28. 
    Toward assessing law students' argument diagrams. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
29. 
    How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving? [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
30. 
    Analyzing a complaint database by means of a genetic-based data mining algorithm. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
31. 
    How to capture and use legal patterns in IT. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
32. 
    e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learned. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
33. 
    Legal metadata interchange framework to match CEN metalex. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
34. 
    Law as a seamless web?: comparison of various network representations of the United States Supreme Court corpus (1791-2005). [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
35. 
    The network of French legal codes. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
36. 
    Legal text analysis of the modification provisions: a pattern oriented approach. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]
    
    
37. 
    Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisions. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]