The SCEAS System
Navigation Menu

Conferences in DBLP

2010 (conf/mammo/2010)

  1. Impact of CAD with Full Field Digital Mammography on Workflow and Cost. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  2. Performance of Triple-Modality CADx on Breast Cancer Diagnostic Classification. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  3. Needle Path Planning Method for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Biopsy Based on Probabilistic Techniques. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  4. X-ray Mammography - MRI Registration Using a Volume-Preserving Affine Transformation and an EM-MRF for Breast Tissue Classification. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  5. Interactive Multi-scale Contrast Enhancement of Previously Processed Digital Mammograms. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  6. Lesion Segmentation in Breast Sonography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  7. Mammogram Compression Using Super-Resolution. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  8. Development of an Ensemble of Digital Breast Object Models. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  9. Analysis of Geometric Accuracy in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  10. Results of Comprehensive Dose Survey for Mammography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  11. Validation of a Simulated Dose Reduction Methodology Using Digital Mammography CDMAM Images and Mastectomy Images. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  12. Measured Dose versus Organ Dose Performance in Digital Mammography Systems. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  13. Noise Reduction in Dual-Energy Contrast Enhanced Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using Regularization. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  14. Phantom Dose Levels Found at Annual Physics Surveys in a National Mammography Screening Program: Comparison of Doses from Analog and Digital Equipment and from Digital Equipment at Different Points in Time. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  15. Task-Based Evaluation of Image Quality of Filtered Back Projection for Breast Tomosynthesis. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  16. A Comparative Study of the Inter-reader Variability of Breast Percent Density Estimation in Digital Mammography: Potential Effect of Reader's Training and Clinical Experience. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  17. Concepts for Efficient and Reliable Multi-modal Breast Image Reading. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  18. Modeling the Impact of CAD on the Outcomes of the UK Breast Screening Programme. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  19. Introducing a Novel Image Quality Measure for Digital Phase-Contrast-Image Evaluation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  20. Modelling Structural Deformations in Mammographic Tissue Using the Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  21. Classification of Linear Structures in Mammograms Using Random Forests. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  22. Should CAD Be Used as a Second Reader? - Exploring Two Alternative Reading Modes for CAD in Screening Mammography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  23. Automated Assessment of Area of Dense Tissue in the Breast: A Comparison with Human Estimation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  24. Local Greylevel Appearance Histogram Based Texture Segmentation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  25. Quantification of Vascular Calcifications on Digitized Mammograms. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  26. Comparison of Tilt Correction Methods in Full Field Digital Mammograms. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  27. Optimising Beam Quality Selection in Mammographic Acquisition Using the Standard Attenuation Rate. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  28. Investigating the Replacement of the Physical Anti-scatter Grid with Digital Image Processing. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  29. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Breast Cancers; Challenging to Diagnose Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC). [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  30. CR Mammography: Image Quality Measurement and Model Calculation for Needle vs. Powder Imaging Plate. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  31. Performance Assessment of Breast Tomosynthesis Systems: Concepts for Two Types of Phantoms. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  32. Realistic Simulation of Microcalcifications in Breast Tomosynthesis. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  33. Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction Using a Grid of Blobs with Projection Matrices. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  34. A Boosting Based Approach for Automatic Micro-calcification Detection. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  35. Automatic Breast Tissue Classification Based on BIRADS Categories. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  36. Validation of Mammographic Texture Analysis for Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  37. Towards Learning Spiculation Score of the Masses in Mammography Images. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  38. Three Digital Mammography Display Configurations: Observer Performance in a Pilot ROC Study. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  39. How Can Image Quality Affect the Detection Performance of Breast CAD (Computer Aided Detection) in FFDM (Full Field Digital Mammography)? - A Comparative Study with Two Different FFDM Systems-. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  40. Feature Point Detection for Non-rigid Registration of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  41. Contrast Detail Curves on Digital Mammography: Performance Comparison of Raw and Filtered Images. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  42. Reader Fatigue Interpreting Mammograms. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  43. Adapting Clinical Images to Appear with Different Noise and Sharpness to Model a Different Detector. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  44. Human Observer Performance in a Single Slice or a Volume: Effect of Background Correlation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  45. Influence of Geometrical Factors on Phase Contrast Fiber Images. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  46. Robust Breast Composition Measurement - VolparaTM. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  47. Technical Evaluation of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  48. Mammographic Interpretation Training: How Could Low Cost Display Devices Help? [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  49. A Survey of Patient Doses from Digital Mammography Systems in the UK in 2007 to 2009. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  50. Analysis of Mammography Quality Control Results: Evidence for a Change in Test Frequency? [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  51. A Comparative Study of Volumetric and Area-Based Breast Density Estimation in Digital Mammography: Results from a Screening Population. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  52. Volumetric Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in a Screening Population. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  53. Determinants and Consequences of Change in Breast Density. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  54. Comparison of Subregional Breast Density with Whole Breast Density. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  55. Comparing a New Volumetric Breast Density Method (VolparaTM) to Cumulus. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  56. Visual Assessment of Density in Digital Mammograms. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  57. Concepts for High-Resolution CT of the Breast. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  58. Optimised Breast Tomosynthesis with a Novel CMOS Flat Panel Detector. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  59. Calculation of OTF, NPS, and DQE for Oblique X-Ray Incidence on Turbid Granular Phosphors. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  60. Scanner for Integrated X-Ray Breast Tomosynthesis and Molecular Breast Imaging Tomosynthesis. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  61. An Anthropomorphic Software Breast Phantom for Tomosynthesis Simulation: Power Spectrum Analysis of Phantom Projections. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  62. Comparison of Two Novel FFDM Systems with Different a-Se Detector Technology: Physical Characterization and Phantom Contrast Detail Evaluation in Clinical Conditions. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  63. Development of a Peripheral Thickness Estimation Method for Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in Mammography Using a 3D Finite Element Breast Model. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  64. Is CAD Able to Assist in the Detection of Subtle Breast Findings - Lobular Cancers, and T1a/T1b Masses in Dense Breasts? [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  65. Towards More Realistic Biomechanical Modelling of Tumours under Mammographic Compressions. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  66. Scoring Systems in Computer-Based Training for Digital Mammography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  67. The Effect of Slab Size on Mass Detection Performance of a Screen-Film CAD System in Reconstructed Tomosynthesis Volumes. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  68. Synthesising Malignant Breast Masses in Normal Mammograms. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  69. Comparison of Microcalcification Detection Rates and Recall Rates in Digital and Analogue Mammography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  70. Constancy Checking of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  71. Mammographic Image Segmentation and Risk Classification Using a Novel Texture Signature Based Methodology. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  72. Stratified Sampling for Case Selection Criteria for Evaluating CAD. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  73. Breast Shapes on Real and Simulated Mammograms. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  74. Regularization Parameter Selection in Maximum a Posteriori Iterative Reconstruction for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  75. Image Quality Phantom in Close Compliance with the ICRU-44 Breast Tissue Substitute Standard and Realistic Background Noise Pattern for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  76. The Standard Attenuation Rate for Quantitative Mammography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  77. National Software Supported Quality Assurance Program in Digital Mammography: Experiences and Challenges. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  78. Inter and Intra Observer Variability in a Semi-automatic Method for Measuring Volumetric Breast Density. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  79. Optimization of the Exposure Parameters with Signal-to-Noise Ratios Considering Human Visual Characteristics in Digital Mammography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  80. Ideal Observer Comparison between Tomographic and Projection x-Ray Images of the Breast. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  81. Breast Structural Noise in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Its Dependence on Reconstruction Methods. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  82. Dual-Energy Dividing Mammography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  83. Effect of BI-RADS Assessment in Improving CAD of Masses. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  84. Analysis of the Benefit/Risk Ratio Obtained in the Valencian Breast Early Detection Program During 2007 and 2008. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  85. Monte Carlo Simulation of Scatter Field for Calculation of Contrast of Discs in Synthetic CDMAM Images. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  86. Classifying Breast Masses in Volumetric Whole Breast Ultrasound Data: A 2.5-Dimensional Approach. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  87. A supplement to the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  88. Investigation of Practical Scoring Methods for Breast Density. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  89. Performance of the New Double Layer Amorphous Selenium Detector for Digital Mammography Compared to the FDA Approved CR System for Digital Mammography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  90. Machine Learning Techniques and Mammographic Risk Assessment. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  91. Automatic BI-RADS Description of Mammographic Masses. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  92. A Clustering Method for the Extraction of Microcalcifications Using Epipolar Curves in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  93. Software Framework for Simulating Clusters of Microcalcifications in Digital Mammography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  94. Improved Microcalcification Detection for Breast Tomosynthesis Using a Penalized-Maximum-Likelihood Reconstruction Method. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  95. Microcalcification Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using an Epipolar Curve Approach. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  96. Spiculated Lesions and Architectural Distortions Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Datasets. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  97. An Observer Model for Lesion Detectability in Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  98. Fast Deformation Simulation of Breasts Using GPU-Based Dynamic Explicit Finite Element Method. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  99. Breast Image Registration by Combining Finite Elements and Free-Form Deformations. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  100. The Effect of Motion Correction on Pharmacokinetic Parameter Estimation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  101. Improved Detection of Cancer in Screening Mammograms by Temporal Comparison. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

  102. Combined Reconstruction and Registration of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]

System may not be available sometimes or not working properly, since it is still in development with continuous upgrades
The rankings that are presented on this page should NOT be considered as formal since the citation info is incomplete in DBLP
System created by [] © 2002
for Data Engineering Laboratory, Department of Informatics, Aristotle University © 2002