The SCEAS System
Navigation Menu

Search the dblp DataBase

Title:
Author:

Kevin D. Ashley: [Publications] [Author Rank by year] [Co-authors] [Prefers] [Cites] [Cited by]

Publications of Author

  1. Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley
    A Case-Based System for Trade Secrets Law. [Citation Graph (1, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1987, pp:60-66 [Conf]
  2. Kevin D. Ashley
    Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals in HYPO. [Citation Graph (1, 0)][DBLP]
    International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1991, v:34, n:6, pp:753-796 [Journal]
  3. Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley
    An Instructional Environment for Practicing Argumentation Skills. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    AAAI, 1994, pp:485-492 [Conf]
  4. Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven
    Generating Dialectical Examples Automatically. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    AAAI, 1992, pp:654-660 [Conf]
  5. Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland
    Compare and Contrast: A Test of Expertise. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    AAAI, 1987, pp:273-278 [Conf]
  6. Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland
    Waiting on Weighting: A Symbolic Least Commitment Approach. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    AAAI, 1988, pp:239-244 [Conf]
  7. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Progress in Textual Case-Based Reasoning: Predicting the Outcome of Legal Cases from Text. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    AAAI, 2006, pp:- [Conf]
  8. Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley
    Assessing Relevance with Extensionally Defined Principles and Cases. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    AAAI/IAAI, 2000, pp:316-322 [Conf]
  9. Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley
    Hypotheticals as Heuristic Device. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    AAAI, 1986, pp:289-297 [Conf]
  10. Edwina L. Rissland, Eduardo M. Valcarce, Kevin D. Ashley
    Explaining and Arguing With Examples. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    AAAI, 1984, pp:288-294 [Conf]
  11. Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch
    Schwachstellenermittlung und Rückmeldungsprinzipen in einem intelligenten Tutorensystem für juristische Argumentation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    DeLFI, 2006, pp:75-86 [Conf]
  12. Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley
    How Different Is Different? Arguing About the Significance of Similarities and Differences. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    EWCBR, 1996, pp:1-15 [Conf]
  13. Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven
    A Logical Representation for Relevance Criteria. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    EWCBR, 1993, pp:338-352 [Conf]
  14. Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren
    A CBR Knowledge Representation for Practical Ethics. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    EWCBR, 1994, pp:181-197 [Conf]
  15. Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley
    Exploring the Dialectic Between Abstract Rules and Concrete Facts: Operationalizing Principles and Cases in Engineering Ethics. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    EWCBR, 1998, pp:37-51 [Conf]
  16. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Experimental Design for Evaluating an AI and Law Program. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems, 2003, pp:10-13 [Conf]
  17. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Generating Legal Arguments and Predictions from Case Texts. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2005, pp:65-74 [Conf]
  18. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Finding Factors: Learning to Classify Case Opinions Under Abstract Fact Categories. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1997, pp:123-131 [Conf]
  19. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal cases. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1999, pp:9-17 [Conf]
  20. Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley
    What Law Students Need to Know to WIN. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1993, pp:152-161 [Conf]
  21. Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley
    Doing Things with Factors. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1995, pp:31-41 [Conf]
  22. Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley
    Evaluating a Learning Environment for Case-Based Argumentation Skills. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1997, pp:170-179 [Conf]
  23. Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch
    Helping Law Students to Understand US Supreme Court Oral Arguments: A Planned Experiment. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2005, pp:55-59 [Conf]
  24. Kevin D. Ashley
    Toward a Computational Theory of Arguing with Precedents. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1989, pp:93-102 [Conf]
  25. Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven
    Toward an Intelligent Tutoring System for Teaching Law Students to Argue with Cases. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1991, pp:42-52 [Conf]
  26. Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren
    An AI investigation of citation's cognitive role. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2001, pp:32-41 [Conf]
  27. Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland
    But, See, Accord: Generating Blue Book Citations in HYPO. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1987, pp:67-74 [Conf]
  28. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Predicting Outcomes of Case-Based Legal Arguments. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2003, pp:233-242 [Conf]
  29. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2001, pp:42-51 [Conf]
  30. Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley, Rosa L. Pinkus
    Introducing PETE: computer support for teaching ethics. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2001, pp:94-98 [Conf]
  31. Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley
    Context Sensitive Case Comparisons in Practical Ethics: Reasoning About Reasons. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1995, pp:316-325 [Conf]
  32. Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren
    Reasoning with Reasons in Case-Based Comparisons. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICCBR, 1995, pp:133-144 [Conf]
  33. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Combining Case-Based and Model-Based Reasoning for Predicting the Outcome of Legal Cases. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICCBR, 2003, pp:65-79 [Conf]
  34. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    The Role of Information Extraction for Textual CBR. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICCBR, 2001, pp:74-89 [Conf]
  35. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Reasoning with Textual Cases. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICCBR, 2005, pp:137-151 [Conf]
  36. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Using Machine Learning for Assigning Indices to Textual Cases. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICCBR, 1997, pp:303-314 [Conf]
  37. Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley
    Bootstrapping Case Base Development with Annotated Case Summaries. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICCBR, 1999, pp:59-73 [Conf]
  38. Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley
    Helping a CBR Program Know What It Knows. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICCBR, 2001, pp:377-391 [Conf]
  39. Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley
    Case Representation, Acquisition, and Retrieval in SIROCCO. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICCBR, 1999, pp:248-262 [Conf]
  40. Kevin D. Ashley
    Defining Salience in Case-Based Arguments. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    IJCAI, 1989, pp:537-542 [Conf]
  41. Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven
    Reasoning Symbolically About Partially Matched Cases. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    IJCAI (1), 1997, pp:335-341 [Conf]
  42. Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley
    Automated Generation of Examples for a Tutorial in Case-Based Argumentation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 1992, pp:475-584 [Conf]
  43. Kevin D. Ashley, Ravi Desai, John M. Levine
    Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Concepts Using Dialectic Arguments vs. Didactic Explanations. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 2002, pp:585-595 [Conf]
  44. Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch
    Toward Legal Argument Instruction with Graph Grammars and Collaborative Filtering Techniques. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 2006, pp:227-236 [Conf]
  45. Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland
    Law, learning and representation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell., 2003, v:150, n:1-2, pp:17-58 [Journal]
  46. Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley, Ronald Prescott Loui
    AI and Law: A fruitful synergy. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell., 2003, v:150, n:1-2, pp:1-15 [Journal]
  47. Kevin D. Ashley
    An AI model of case-based legal argument from a jurisprudential viewpoint. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell. Law, 2002, v:10, n:1-3, pp:163-218 [Journal]
  48. Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley
    A note on dimensions and factors. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell. Law, 2002, v:10, n:1-3, pp:65-77 [Journal]
  49. Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland
    A Case-Based Approach to Modeling Legal Expertise. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    IEEE Expert, 1988, v:3, n:3, pp:70-77 [Journal]
  50. Kevin D. Ashley
    Interpretive Reasoning with Hypothetical Cases. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    FLAIRS Conference, 2007, pp:387-392 [Conf]
  51. Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Vincent Aleven
    Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2007, pp:271-275 [Conf]
  52. Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven
    Student's Usage of Multiple Linked Argument Representations in LARGO. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Mensch & Computer, 2007, pp:245-250 [Conf]

  53. AIED Applications in Ill-Defined Domains. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  54. Evaluating Legal Argument Instruction with Graphical Representations Using LARGO. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  55. Toward supporting hypothesis formation and testing in an interpretive domain. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  56. Assessing Argument Diagrams in an Ill-defined Domain. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  57. Graph Grammars: An ITS Technology for Diagram Representations. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  58. Some Thoughts on Using Computers to Teach Argumentation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  59. What a Legal CBR Ontology Should Provide. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  60. Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisions. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  61. Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  62. Toward assessing law students' argument diagrams. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  63. Toward Modeling and Teaching Legal Case-Based Adaptation with Expert Examples. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  64. Re-evaluating LARGO in the Classroom: Are Diagrams Better Than Text for Teaching Argumentation Skills?. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  65. Eliciting Informative Feedback in Peer Review: Importance of Problem-Specific Scaffolding. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  66. Hypotheticals as Heuristic Device. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  67. A Process Model of Legal Argument with Hypotheticals. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  68. Argument Diagramming and Diagnostic Reliability. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  69. Towards Modeling Systematic Interpretation of Codified Law. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  70. Argument graph classification with Genetic Programming and C4.5. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  71. Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  72. Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


Search in 0.006secs, Finished in 0.009secs
NOTICE1
System may not be available sometimes or not working properly, since it is still in development with continuous upgrades
NOTICE2
The rankings that are presented on this page should NOT be considered as formal since the citation info is incomplete in DBLP
 
System created by asidirop@csd.auth.gr [http://users.auth.gr/~asidirop/] © 2002
for Data Engineering Laboratory, Department of Informatics, Aristotle University © 2002