The SCEAS System
Navigation Menu
Introduction
Collection Based
Clustering
Ranking
Paper Based
Journals
Conferences
DB Status
Statistics
Search

Search the dblp DataBase

Title:
Author:
Arthur W. Apter: [Publications] [Author Rank by year] [Co-authors] [Prefers] [Cites] [Cited by]

Publications of Author

  1. Arthur W. Apter
    Some remarks on indestructibility and Hamkins' lottery preparation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Arch. Math. Log., 2003, v:42, n:8, pp:717-735 [Journal]
  2. Arthur W. Apter
    On a problem of Foreman and Magidor. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Arch. Math. Log., 2005, v:44, n:4, pp:493-498 [Journal]
  3. Arthur W. Apter
    Diamond, square, and level by level equivalence. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Arch. Math. Log., 2005, v:44, n:3, pp:387-395 [Journal]
  4. Arthur W. Apter, Grigor Sargsyan
    Identity crises and strong compactness III: Woodin cardinals. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Arch. Math. Log., 2006, v:45, n:3, pp:307-322 [Journal]
  5. Arthur W. Apter, Peter Koepke
    The Consistency Strength of Àw and Àw1 Being Rowbottom Cardinals Without the Axiom of Choice. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Arch. Math. Log., 2006, v:45, n:6, pp:721-737 [Journal]
  6. Arthur W. Apter
    Failures of SCH and Level by Level Equivalence. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Arch. Math. Log., 2006, v:45, n:7, pp:831-838 [Journal]
  7. Arthur W. Apter
    Patterns of Compact Cardinals. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 1997, v:89, n:2-3, pp:101-115 [Journal]
  8. Arthur W. Apter, James Cummings
    A Global Version of a Theorem of Ben-David and Magidor. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 2000, v:102, n:3, pp:199-222 [Journal]
  9. Arthur W. Apter, Carlos DiPrisco, James M. Henle, William S. Zwicker
    Filter Spaces: Toward a Unified Theory of Large Cardinals and Embedding Axioms. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 1989, v:41, n:2, pp:93-106 [Journal]
  10. Arthur W. Apter, Menachem Magidor
    Instances of Dependent Choice and the Measurability of alephomega + 1. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 1995, v:74, n:3, pp:203-219 [Journal]
  11. Arthur W. Apter
    The least strongly compact can be the least strong and indestructible. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 2006, v:144, n:1-3, pp:33-42 [Journal]
  12. Arthur W. Apter
    Supercompactness and Measurable Limits of Strong Cardinals. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 2001, v:66, n:2, pp:629-639 [Journal]
  13. Arthur W. Apter
    Some Structural Results Concerning Supercompact Cardinals. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 2001, v:66, n:4, pp:1919-1927 [Journal]
  14. Arthur W. Apter
    Changing Cofinalities and Infinite Exponents. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 1981, v:46, n:1, pp:89-95 [Journal]
  15. Arthur W. Apter
    Measurability and Degrees of Strong Compactness. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 1981, v:46, n:2, pp:249-254 [Journal]
  16. Arthur W. Apter
    An AD-Like Model. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 1985, v:50, n:2, pp:531-543 [Journal]
  17. Arthur W. Apter
    Successors of Singular Cardinals and Measurability Revisited. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 1990, v:55, n:2, pp:492-501 [Journal]
  18. Arthur W. Apter
    AD and Patterns of Singular Cardinals below Theta. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 1996, v:61, n:1, pp:225-235 [Journal]
  19. Arthur W. Apter
    Laver Indestructability and the Class of Compact Ordinals. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 1998, v:63, n:1, pp:149-157 [Journal]
  20. Arthur W. Apter
    On Measurable Limits of Compact Cardinals. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 1999, v:64, n:4, pp:1675-1688 [Journal]
  21. Arthur W. Apter, James Cummings
    Identity Crises, Strong Compactness. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 2000, v:65, n:4, pp:1895-1910 [Journal]
  22. Arthur W. Apter, James Cummings
    Blowing up The Power Set of The Least Measurable. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 2002, v:67, n:3, pp:915-923 [Journal]
  23. Arthur W. Apter, Moti Gitik
    The Least Measurable Can Be Strongly Compact and Indestructible. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 1998, v:63, n:4, pp:1404-1412 [Journal]
  24. Arthur W. Apter, Joel David Hamkins
    Indestructibility and The Level-By-Level Agreement Between Strong Compactness and Supercompactness. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 2002, v:67, n:2, pp:820-840 [Journal]
  25. Arthur W. Apter, Joel David Hamkins
    Exactly controlling the non-supercompact strongly compact cardinals. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 2003, v:68, n:2, pp:669-688 [Journal]
  26. Arthur W. Apter, James M. Henle
    Large Cardinal Structures Below alefomega. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Symb. Log., 1986, v:51, n:3, pp:591-603 [Journal]
  27. Arthur W. Apter
    Strong Compactness and a Global Version of a Theorem of Ben-David and Magidor. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2000, v:46, n:4, pp:453-459 [Journal]
  28. Arthur W. Apter
    Some Remarks on Normal Measures and Measurable Cardinals. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2001, v:47, n:1, pp:35-44 [Journal]
  29. Arthur W. Apter
    Strong Cardinals can be Fully Laver Indestructible. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2002, v:48, n:4, pp:499-507 [Journal]
  30. Arthur W. Apter
    Characterizing strong compactness via strongness. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2003, v:49, n:4, pp:375-384 [Journal]
  31. Arthur W. Apter
    Failures of GCH and the level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2003, v:49, n:6, pp:587-597 [Journal]
  32. Arthur W. Apter
    Level by level equivalence and strong compactness. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2004, v:50, n:1, pp:51-64 [Journal]
  33. Arthur W. Apter
    A Cardinal Pattern Inspired by AD. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 1996, v:42, n:, pp:211-218 [Journal]
  34. Arthur W. Apter
    More an the Least Strongly Compact Cardinal. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 1997, v:43, n:, pp:427-430 [Journal]
  35. Arthur W. Apter
    Forcing the Least Measurable to Violate GCH. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 1999, v:45, n:, pp:551-560 [Journal]
  36. Arthur W. Apter, Joel David Hamkins
    Indestructible Weakly Compact Cardinals and the Necessity of Supercompactness for Certain Proof Schemata. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2001, v:47, n:4, pp:563-571 [Journal]
  37. Arthur W. Apter
    Universal partial indestructibility and strong compactness. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2005, v:51, n:5, pp:524-531 [Journal]
  38. Arthur W. Apter
    An Easton theorem for level by level equivalence. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2005, v:51, n:3, pp:247-253 [Journal]
  39. Arthur W. Apter
    Removing Laver functions from supercompactness arguments. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2005, v:51, n:2, pp:154-156 [Journal]
  40. Arthur W. Apter
    Supercompactness and measurable limits of strong cardinals II: Applications to level by level equivalence. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Math. Log. Q., 2006, v:52, n:5, pp:457-463 [Journal]
  41. Arthur W. Apter
    On the Consistency Strength of Two Choiceless Cardinal Patterns. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 1999, v:40, n:3, pp:341-345 [Journal]
  42. Arthur W. Apter
    Supercompactness and level by level equivalence are compatible with indestructibility for strong compactness. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Arch. Math. Log., 2007, v:46, n:3-4, pp:155-163 [Journal]

  43. Aspects of strong compactness, measurability, and indestructibility. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  44. On a problem of Woodin. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  45. A new proof of a theorem of Magidor. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  46. Identity crises and strong compactness. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  47. Some remarks on a question of D. H. Fremlin regarding epsilon-density. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  48. An L-like model containing very large cardinals. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  49. Indestructibility and measurable cardinals with few and many measures. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  50. Universal indestructibility for degrees of supercompactness and strongly compact cardinals. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  51. Making all cardinals almost Ramsey. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


Search in 0.003secs, Finished in 0.333secs
NOTICE1
System may not be available sometimes or not working properly, since it is still in development with continuous upgrades
NOTICE2
The rankings that are presented on this page should NOT be considered as formal since the citation info is incomplete in DBLP
 
Introduction Collection Based Clustering Ranking Paper Based Journals Conferences DB Status Statistics Search
System created by asidirop@csd.auth.gr [http://users.auth.gr/~asidirop/] © 2002
for Data Engineering Laboratory, Department of Informatics, Aristotle University © 2002