Search the dblp DataBase
Henry Prakken :
[Publications ]
[Author Rank by year ]
[Co-authors ]
[Prefers ]
[Cites ]
[Cited by ]
Publications of Author
Jelle van Veenen , Henry Prakken A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ArgMAS, 2005, pp:138-153 [Conf ] Jelle van Veenen , Henry Prakken A verifiable protocol for arguing about rejections in negotiation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] AAMAS, 2005, pp:1165-1166 [Conf ] Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, 2002, pp:342-381 [Conf ] Henry Prakken , Thomas F. Gordon Rules of Order for Electronic Group Decision Making - A Formalization Methodology. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Collaboration between Human and Artificial Societies, 1999, pp:246-263 [Conf ] Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] FAPR, 1996, pp:510-524 [Conf ] Hugo de Bruin , Henry Prakken , Jörgen S. Svensson The use of legal knowledge-based systems in public administration: what can go wrong? [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems, 2003, pp:14-16 [Conf ] Henry Prakken Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 2001, pp:119-128 [Conf ] Henry Prakken A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 2005, pp:85-94 [Conf ] Henry Prakken A Tool in Modelling Disagreement in Law: Preferring the Most Specific Argument. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 1991, pp:165-174 [Conf ] Henry Prakken A Logical Framework for Modelling Legal Argument. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 1993, pp:1-9 [Conf ] Henry Prakken From Logic to Dialectics in Legal Argument. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 1995, pp:165-174 [Conf ] Henry Prakken , Chris Reed , Douglas Walton Argumentation Schemes and Generalizations in Reasoning about Evidence. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 2003, pp:32-41 [Conf ] Henry Prakken , Chris Reed , Douglas Walton Dialogues about the burden of proof. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 2005, pp:115-124 [Conf ] Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor On the Relation Between Legal Language and Legal Argument: Assumptions, Applicability and Dynamic Priorities. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 1995, pp:1-10 [Conf ] Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor Reasoning with Precedents in a Dialogue Game. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 1997, pp:1-9 [Conf ] Henry Prakken On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] JELIA, 2000, pp:224-238 [Conf ] Gerard Vreeswijk , Henry Prakken Credulous and Sceptical Argument Games for Preferred Semantics. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] JELIA, 2000, pp:239-253 [Conf ] Henry Prakken Dialectical Proof Theory for Defeasible Argumentation with Defeasible Priorities (Preliminary Report). [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ModelAge Workshop, 1997, pp:202-215 [Conf ] Henry Prakken Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] NMR, 2002, pp:91-102 [Conf ] Floris Bex , Henry Prakken , Chris Reed , Douglas Walton Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Artif. Intell. Law, 2003, v:11, n:2-3, pp:125-165 [Journal ] Henry Prakken An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Artif. Intell. Law, 2002, v:10, n:1-3, pp:113-133 [Journal ] Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Artif. Intell. Law, 1996, v:4, n:3-4, pp:331-368 [Journal ] Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Artif. Intell. Law, 1998, v:6, n:2-4, pp:231-287 [Journal ] Eveline T. Feteris , Henry Prakken Introduction: Dialectical legal argument: Formal and informal models. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Artif. Intell. Law, 2000, v:8, n:2/3, pp:107-113 [Journal ] Pieter Dijkstra , Floris Bex , Henry Prakken , Kees de Vey Mestdagh Towards a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Artif. Intell. Law, 2005, v:13, n:1, pp:133-151 [Journal ] Henry Prakken An Argumentation Framework in Default Logic. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 1993, v:9, n:1-2, pp:93-132 [Journal ] Henry Prakken Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] CoRR, 2002, v:0, n:, pp:- [Journal ] Henry Prakken Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure? [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Fundam. Inform., 2001, v:48, n:2-3, pp:253-271 [Journal ] Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 1997, v:7, n:1, pp:- [Journal ] Gerhard Brewka , Henry Prakken , Gerard Vreeswijk Special Issue on Computational Dialectics: an Introduction. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] J. Log. Comput., 2003, v:13, n:3, pp:317-318 [Journal ] Henry Prakken Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] J. Log. Comput., 2005, v:15, n:6, pp:1009-1040 [Journal ] Henry Prakken Two Approaches to the Formalisation of Defeasible Deontic Reasoning. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Studia Logica, 1996, v:57, n:1, pp:73-90 [Journal ] Henry Prakken , Marek J. Sergot Contrary-to-Duty Obligations. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Studia Logica, 1996, v:57, n:1, pp:91-115 [Journal ] F. J. Bex , Henry Prakken , Bart Verheij Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 2007, pp:1-10 [Conf ] Susan W. van den Braak , Gerard Vreeswijk , Henry Prakken AVERs : an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 2007, pp:11-15 [Conf ] Pieter Dijkstra , Henry Prakken , Kees de Vey Mestdagh An implementation of norm-based agent negotiation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 2007, pp:167-175 [Conf ] Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 2007, pp:97-106 [Conf ] Jobien Sombekke , Tom M. van Engers , Henry Prakken Argumentation structures in legal dossiers. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] ICAIL, 2007, pp:277-281 [Conf ] Thomas F. Gordon , Henry Prakken , Douglas Walton The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP ] Artif. Intell., 2007, v:171, n:10-15, pp:875-896 [Journal ] Personality-Based Practical Reasoning. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Practical Reasoning Using Values. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Investigating Stories in a Formal Dialogue Game. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game Theory Investigation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] More on Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] A formal model of adjudication dialogues. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP ] Search in 0.010secs, Finished in 0.012secs