The SCEAS System
Navigation Menu

Search the dblp DataBase

Title:
Author:

Henry Prakken: [Publications] [Author Rank by year] [Co-authors] [Prefers] [Cites] [Cited by]

Publications of Author

  1. Jelle van Veenen, Henry Prakken
    A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ArgMAS, 2005, pp:138-153 [Conf]
  2. Jelle van Veenen, Henry Prakken
    A verifiable protocol for arguing about rejections in negotiation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    AAMAS, 2005, pp:1165-1166 [Conf]
  3. Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
    The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, 2002, pp:342-381 [Conf]
  4. Henry Prakken, Thomas F. Gordon
    Rules of Order for Electronic Group Decision Making - A Formalization Methodology. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Collaboration between Human and Artificial Societies, 1999, pp:246-263 [Conf]
  5. Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
    A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    FAPR, 1996, pp:510-524 [Conf]
  6. Hugo de Bruin, Henry Prakken, Jörgen S. Svensson
    The use of legal knowledge-based systems in public administration: what can go wrong? [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems, 2003, pp:14-16 [Conf]
  7. Henry Prakken
    Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2001, pp:119-128 [Conf]
  8. Henry Prakken
    A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2005, pp:85-94 [Conf]
  9. Henry Prakken
    A Tool in Modelling Disagreement in Law: Preferring the Most Specific Argument. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1991, pp:165-174 [Conf]
  10. Henry Prakken
    A Logical Framework for Modelling Legal Argument. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1993, pp:1-9 [Conf]
  11. Henry Prakken
    From Logic to Dialectics in Legal Argument. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1995, pp:165-174 [Conf]
  12. Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Douglas Walton
    Argumentation Schemes and Generalizations in Reasoning about Evidence. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2003, pp:32-41 [Conf]
  13. Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Douglas Walton
    Dialogues about the burden of proof. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2005, pp:115-124 [Conf]
  14. Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
    On the Relation Between Legal Language and Legal Argument: Assumptions, Applicability and Dynamic Priorities. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1995, pp:1-10 [Conf]
  15. Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
    Reasoning with Precedents in a Dialogue Game. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 1997, pp:1-9 [Conf]
  16. Henry Prakken
    On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    JELIA, 2000, pp:224-238 [Conf]
  17. Gerard Vreeswijk, Henry Prakken
    Credulous and Sceptical Argument Games for Preferred Semantics. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    JELIA, 2000, pp:239-253 [Conf]
  18. Henry Prakken
    Dialectical Proof Theory for Defeasible Argumentation with Defeasible Priorities (Preliminary Report). [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ModelAge Workshop, 1997, pp:202-215 [Conf]
  19. Henry Prakken
    Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    NMR, 2002, pp:91-102 [Conf]
  20. Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Douglas Walton
    Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell. Law, 2003, v:11, n:2-3, pp:125-165 [Journal]
  21. Henry Prakken
    An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell. Law, 2002, v:10, n:1-3, pp:113-133 [Journal]
  22. Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
    A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell. Law, 1996, v:4, n:3-4, pp:331-368 [Journal]
  23. Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
    Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell. Law, 1998, v:6, n:2-4, pp:231-287 [Journal]
  24. Eveline T. Feteris, Henry Prakken
    Introduction: Dialectical legal argument: Formal and informal models. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell. Law, 2000, v:8, n:2/3, pp:107-113 [Journal]
  25. Pieter Dijkstra, Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Kees de Vey Mestdagh
    Towards a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell. Law, 2005, v:13, n:1, pp:133-151 [Journal]
  26. Henry Prakken
    An Argumentation Framework in Default Logic. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 1993, v:9, n:1-2, pp:93-132 [Journal]
  27. Henry Prakken
    Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    CoRR, 2002, v:0, n:, pp:- [Journal]
  28. Henry Prakken
    Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure? [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Fundam. Inform., 2001, v:48, n:2-3, pp:253-271 [Journal]
  29. Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
    Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 1997, v:7, n:1, pp:- [Journal]
  30. Gerhard Brewka, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk
    Special Issue on Computational Dialectics: an Introduction. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Log. Comput., 2003, v:13, n:3, pp:317-318 [Journal]
  31. Henry Prakken
    Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    J. Log. Comput., 2005, v:15, n:6, pp:1009-1040 [Journal]
  32. Henry Prakken
    Two Approaches to the Formalisation of Defeasible Deontic Reasoning. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Studia Logica, 1996, v:57, n:1, pp:73-90 [Journal]
  33. Henry Prakken, Marek J. Sergot
    Contrary-to-Duty Obligations. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Studia Logica, 1996, v:57, n:1, pp:91-115 [Journal]
  34. F. J. Bex, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij
    Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2007, pp:1-10 [Conf]
  35. Susan W. van den Braak, Gerard Vreeswijk, Henry Prakken
    AVERs: an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2007, pp:11-15 [Conf]
  36. Pieter Dijkstra, Henry Prakken, Kees de Vey Mestdagh
    An implementation of norm-based agent negotiation. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2007, pp:167-175 [Conf]
  37. Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
    Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2007, pp:97-106 [Conf]
  38. Jobien Sombekke, Tom M. van Engers, Henry Prakken
    Argumentation structures in legal dossiers. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    ICAIL, 2007, pp:277-281 [Conf]
  39. Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken, Douglas Walton
    The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. [Citation Graph (0, 0)][DBLP]
    Artif. Intell., 2007, v:171, n:10-15, pp:875-896 [Journal]

  40. Personality-Based Practical Reasoning. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  41. Practical Reasoning Using Values. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  42. Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  43. Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  44. Investigating Stories in a Formal Dialogue Game. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  45. Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  46. Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game Theory Investigation. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  47. Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  48. Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  49. Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  50. More on Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  51. Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  52. Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  53. Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  54. A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  55. A formal model of adjudication dialogues. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  56. Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  57. A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


  58. Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. [Citation Graph (, )][DBLP]


Search in 0.007secs, Finished in 0.009secs
NOTICE1
System may not be available sometimes or not working properly, since it is still in development with continuous upgrades
NOTICE2
The rankings that are presented on this page should NOT be considered as formal since the citation info is incomplete in DBLP
 
System created by asidirop@csd.auth.gr [http://users.auth.gr/~asidirop/] © 2002
for Data Engineering Laboratory, Department of Informatics, Aristotle University © 2002